New eggcorn spotted in the wild: "sure up" instead of "shore up"
New eggcorn spotted in the wild: "sure up" instead of "shore up"
Thanks to 3 Quarks Daily and The Browser for sharing my latest grammar nerdout with their readers:
https://3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2025/05/the-trouble-with-dangling-modifiers.html
https://thebrowser.com/free/tattoos-trouble/?ref=the-browser-newsletter
The trouble with dangling modifiers. New blog post:
https://stancarey.wordpress.com/2025/05/06/the-trouble-with-dangling-modifiers/
On the blog, a review of the linguistics book 'New Horizons in Prescriptivism Research' https://stancarey.wordpress.com/2025/04/24/book-review-new-horizons-in-prescriptivism-research-2024/
Dangling modifier in the Irish Times Weekend Quiz. As a usage dictionary notes, "It's the funny ones that cause trouble." https://stancarey.wordpress.com/2013/06/06/a-hovering-dangling-modifier/
Question for non-United States folks ... Is the adjective/description "US-American" common, or at least familiar to you? I noticed this caption on #wikipedia. (It's better than "USian," I suppose.)
Arguments against the U.S. using "American" as its demonym are duly noted, but unpersuasive. Look, no other country's name contains the word America. And every alternative is awkward.
By the way, do people from South Sudan, the DRC, or Chad criticize the Central African Republic for claiming "Central African" as their demonym? Have they considered "CA-Republican" instead?
There are multiple questions in Geoff Lindsay’s short multiple choice questionnaire on the changing use of *multiple* in English.
It only took me a couple of minutes.
A brief history (and critique) of English spelling reform that I once wrote for @HistoryToday:
https://www.historytoday.com/brief-history-english-spelling-reform
Supplementary notes on the history of English spelling reform:
https://stancarey.wordpress.com/2016/02/08/the-history-of-english-spelling-reform/
A thing about language that a lot of people don't know is that you can dislike a usage intensely – a pronunciation, a piece of grammar, etc. – without presuming to reject it on behalf of all people, in all places, for all time
I like to sometimes for no other reason than just because I can and because it bothers pedants split an infinitive extravagantly
John Waters on Ivy Compton-Burnett, from his marvellous book "Role Models"
People will be wondering how to use hyphens till the coworkers come home
Fun facts about the word "ourself":
—It's older than "ourselves"
—It can be singular or plural
—It has multiple grammatical roles
—All good dictionaries still list it
—Shakespeare used it *dozens* of times
—You can use it too, if you want
https://stancarey.wordpress.com/2022/03/25/we-ourself-can-use-this-pronoun/
When something is described as 'robust' - a favourite word of politicians and others in positions of authority, I generally interpret what has the adjective applied to it as being just about adequate.
"The homes at Upper Achintore in Fort William were delivered by Glasgow-based construction firm The JR Group, on behalf of Link Group."
From which housing warehouse were they 'delivered'?
The language of Shakespeare and Chaucer has become the language of Hostile Vehicle Mitigation barriers.
https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/terrorism-advice-means-keynsham-remembrance-9670784
It's an overbridge, i.e. an arched span carrying the railway over a path, track or road, not a tunnel.
https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/proposal-develop-former-railway-tunnel-9674325
Writing tip: Ignore dogmatic usage advice based on the superstitions and pet preferences of 19th-century grammarians
Sometimes I wish the past tense of "read" was spelt differently so that a subjectless report like "Read such-and-such a book" wouldn't look like a command
Can't think of a viable alternative, though, and even if I could, it wouldn't catch on