Mx. Alba :tranarchy_punk_transgender:<p>This is a <a href="https://blahaj.zone/tags/PSA" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PSA</a>. The <a href="https://blahaj.zone/tags/Dutch" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Dutch</a> <a href="https://blahaj.zone/tags/TTRPG" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#TTRPG</a> <a href="https://blahaj.zone/tags/Discord" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Discord</a> server <a href="https://blahaj.zone/tags/Dutch20" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Dutch20</a> is not <a href="https://blahaj.zone/tags/trans" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#trans</a><span> inclusive. Long story short, they would rather accommodate people who, at best, don't care about trans rights, than accommodate trans people. They prefer negative peace (repressing "difficult" or "confronting" discussions) over justice (repressing content that is harmful to trans people).<br><br>Yes, this concerns </span><a href="https://blahaj.zone/tags/JKRowling" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#JKRowling</a> <a href="https://blahaj.zone/tags/HarryPotter" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#HarryPotter</a><span> content specifically. Trans people calling out the harm such content does are silenced and dogpiled by moderators, and outright dismissed by confidential mediators. The stance they communicate is that they want to be welcoming to everyone so they do not want to ban any content. I wonder if they hold that same opinion regarding other kinds of harmful content like for example racist content, CSA, ... or is this "accepting" stance only reserved for content that is harmful to trans people?<br><br>Bottom line... If you're queer and/or an ally and are a member of that Discord, please speak out and/or leave it. It is clearly not welcoming to </span><i>us</i>.</p>