Strypey<p>(1/2)</p><p>"The best way I can illustrate that is with this chart based on those ASA statistics ... It speaks for itself, and I hope you will share it far and wide."</p><p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://federated.press/@gavinellis" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>gavinellis</span></a></span>, 2025</p><p><a href="https://knightlyviews.com/but-waittheres-more-being-sucked-away/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">knightlyviews.com/but-waitther</span><span class="invisible">es-more-being-sucked-away/</span></a></p><p>I would, but this is a terrible graph. For a start, axes are not labeled. So while I can guess that the numbers along the bottom are years, showing change over time, the numbers up the side are a mystery. Are they $ or %? Are there implied 0s after them? How many?</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.nzoss.nz/tags/NewsMedia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>NewsMedia</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.nzoss.nz/tags/advertising" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>advertising</span></a></p>