Ah yes, because the problem worthy of public debate is what we *call* it when #SCOTUS decides major issues without full briefing, argument, or written opinions—not, you know, what the Court is actually *doing* in these cases.
news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/...
Kavanaugh Pushes New Label for...
@heidilifeldman Also see: legal profession.
The entire profession of judges in the USA need to sign an open letter demanding that the six insurrectionary MAGA SCOTUS appointees start obeying the constitution or, if they are for some unfathomable reason unable to follow the law, that they step aside and *abstain* from ruling until such day that the SCOTUS can be reconstituted to follow the constitution.
Any MAGA judges unwilling to sign such a letter may get their quick fix rewards from trump, but will face justice in one form or another eventually.
#USpol #vaccine #SCOTUS #RFKJr
Still relevant. Still precedent.
‘ Real liberty for all could not exist under the operation of a principle which recognizes the right of each individual person to use his own, whether in respect of his person or his property, regardless of the injury that may be done to others. ‘
— Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Marshall Harlan, writing for the majority, Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 US 11 (1905)
US President does not #constitutionally have the #power to order #deployment of #NationalGuard troops #nationwide to #arrest #Americans under the pretense of #policing state and local #crime. At least not under the #Constitution as written, enforced > than 2 centuries. This will B #litigated. We will see #trump faction dominating #SCOTUS under #ChiefJustice #JohnRoberts treats this #breach of #constitutional division of powers as yet another opportunity to embolden #Trump https://michaelpopok.substack.com/p/rules-of-engagement-dictates-predicated
"From Trump’s#SCOTUS tariff petition: A statute can give the president unlimited power over tariffs w/o mentioning tariffs."
-J Willick
"Yes, let's be clear what they're saying:by declaring an "emergency" (that judges can't question & Congress can only override with 2/3 majorities), POTUS has unlimited tariff power under IEEPA, which doesn't expressly authorize tariffs AND has never before been used for tariffs."
-S Lincicome
Will Trump's SC loyalists grant him anfor #tariffs, bc
UET?
#USPol
Federal judges who spoke to NBC News said the Supreme Court should better explain its emergency rulings.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5485867-federal-judges-trump-cases/
Supreme Court: No Task Is More Urgent Than Giving Big Balls Your Private Data https://ballsandstrikes.org/scotus/big-balls-data-ssa-supreme-court/
#SCOTUS #USPol