I suppose it is conceivable that a universe might be just matter flattening onto the surface of a rotating black hole, in which case, we might be the solution to the question of whether information is lost when it enters one. I wondered about that years ago. It would yield, I think, a spreading, but very flattened, universe. The universe would then tend to acquire the rotational velocity of the black hole, though not all at once. But I wonder why there wouldn't be a directional gravitational bias, if slight. It should be measurable.
If the above is ever proven true, Sabine will no doubt be pleased that there might be no free will.
It seems like, if you're a holographic universe replaying events of a past universe, then the whole darned universe got sucked into a black hole, not just a planet or two, and a black hole becomes a surface broadcasting holograms which look like what we see.
If that is the case, what can we say about smaller, local black holes? Are they replaying solar and planetary inputs? Where?
It would seem like, if there is replaying going on, it would be inside of the event horizon, although there is black hole radiation, so what do I know about that?
On the plus side, the information paradox would seem to disappear altogether. Yay, no paradox.
But then we are possibly living through the replaying of what happened to a doomed universe. Cheery.
And the passage of time is perhaps then underpinned by the rotation of a gargantuan black hole playing out a dead universe's data. Then local black holes should be altering the rate of the passage of time somewhat. Is the passage of time somehow coupled to the rotational rate of a gargantuan black hole, modified and localized by the presence of matter? Is its arrow fixed because of a gargantuan black hole's rotation? Hm. Could time have angular momentum?
I have officially reached peak coffee for today. Back to debugging misbehaving video game bots. Hey, if this is a black hole rerun, I've fixed them already. Woo-hoo!