mastodon.ie is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Irish Mastodon - run from Ireland, we welcome all who respect the community rules and members.

Administered by:

Server stats:

1.7K
active users

#digitalsovereignty

23 posts20 participants0 posts today

🌍 Interested in shaping Europe's digital future through the power of Digital Commons and sovereign tech?
Join @NGICommons at #NGIForum25 to explore strategies for Digital Sovereignty and support for open digital infrastructures.
📆 19–20 June 2025
📍 Brussels, Albert Borschette Congress Center
🎟️ Get your ticket: commons.ngi.eu/event/ngi-forum

#OpenInternet #DigitalCommons # #FOSS #InternetGovernance #DigitalSovereignty

@martelinnovate @openfuture @OpenForumEurope @cnrs @linuxfoundation @ngi

📍 On 10 June, our CEO, @ldubost , will be in Warsaw at the APELL Conference to talk about building sustainable open source.

His talk?
“Sustainable Open Source: XWiki’s Paying Apps Model in Practice”

It’s time Europe supports models that keep open source strong and sovereign.
We’re excited to join the conversation at @apell If you want to say hi, register to participate: apell.info/apell-conference-20

This week, I participated in a panel discussion on the topic "Open Source as a tool for more independence" for public organizations. The closing question was borrowed from a German politician who had given a talk earlier at the event. He asked: "Are there some areas where we should not migrate to Open Source?"

My short answer was "No."
However, I feel the need to elaborate a bit more.

Often, this question implies that there might be technical, stability, or security reasons why Open Source wouldn't be suitable for certain use cases. But Open Source is simply a licensing model. There's no inherent reason why software is less stable, secure, or well-written just because it is licensed under an Open Source model. So yes — "no" remains my answer.

That said, a more practical and interesting question would have been: "Where should I start when moving to Open Source?"

It’s important to think strategically about where to begin and what the second or third steps might be in the journey toward greater digital sovereignty. A good approach is to start with software that has few or no external dependencies and can be migrated independently. Software with many interdependencies should be addressed later.

Think of your software ecosystem as a tree, where each piece of software is connected and dependent on others. A successful migration project should start with the leaves — the independent components — and then gradually move toward the root. This way, results and first positive experiences can be gathered quickly.

We are proud to partner with @nextcloud for Nextcloud Summit 2025.

The movement for digital sovereignty is gaining momentum. And we are excited to be part of it.
This Summit brings together experts, decision-makers, and innovators to explore practical solutions that give organizations control over their digital infrastructure.
OpenProject brings comprehensive project management to Nextcloud Hub.

🔗 Learn more & register: nextcloud.com/summit/
#NextcloudSummit25 #DigitalSovereignty #OpenSource

This is an excellent article with a lot of useful information about how Infomaniak's sovereign cloud works:

"With more than 15 multi-data center cloud infrastructures, #Infomaniak is one of the few cloud providers in #Europe to master its data centers, develop its own technologies and guarantee sovereign #cloud services. This ensures a clear legal framework, a committed data confidentiality policy and job creation at local level while helping develop Europe’s technological independence. In this article, we explain what a cloud is, who its architects are and what criteria must be met to assert that a cloud is truly sovereign."

(This article was published in 🇬🇧 , 🇫🇷 , 🇩🇪, 🇮🇹 and 🇪🇸)

news.infomaniak.com/en/soverei
#EuropeanAlternatives #BuyFromEU #BuyEuropean #DigitalSovereignty

Can you suggest a Sweden/Nordic/EU hosting provider?

I've used pair.com since 2001 (was in US then, Sweden now).

They've been great, but they are my last US IT dependency. #digitalsovereignty

I have two .com domains. I use <2GB of disk, static web pages, incoming mail (I use POP3; crypto secure email *not* important), some aliases, outgoing SMTP, and shell access. I prefer FreeBSD over Linux; not essential.

Simple stuff.

Prefer FOSS-adjacent (I pay for sr.ht) and long haul stability.

An open letter, signed by ORG and others, urges the Prime Minister to take action to address the UK’s dependence on US tech companies for core infrastructure, data management, and public services.

We are calling for:

* The establishment of an emergency technology taskforce to address existing national security risks

* Clear and consistent messaging on artificial intelligence

* A test-and-learn approach to AI to minimize harm to the public

futureinstitute.tech/innovatio

Future of Technology Institute · Open Letter to Prime Minister Starmer Calling for an Independent Approach to UK Tech & AI Policy | Future of Technology InstituteProminent experts call for urgent action to reduce the UK’s deepening reliance on giant US tech companies for core infrastructure, data handling, and public services.

Who doesn't know the situation: Quickly leaving office to catch a train or join some dinner or sport class, but then the laptop cannot be powered off due to a #Windows update.

The software alternative eu-os.eu installs updates invisible in the background. After a reboot, the users have a freshly updated system without any waiting time! In many ways, #Linux is more advanced than #Windows!

Please share/follow to help raising awareness about #EU_OS #DigitalSovereignty #EuroStack.

Data from the domain DNS shows that many European public services rely on proprietary cloud services: jurgen.gaeremyn.be/2025/03/08/

"Querying mail-servers teaches that in some countries, over 70% of all public services rely on this American provider."

Last week, #Microsoft allegedly decided to cancel MS365 services of a Chinese university with a notice of about one week: scmp.com/tech/tech-war/article

1/2

jurgen.gaeremyn.beEuropean critical dependencies – Pseudo Random Noise
More from Pseudo Random Noise

Of all the apps & (cloud) services - unless your life is extremely boring - the highest ROI is taking ownership of your photos and videos.

Some legislations mandate scanning & many providers do it anyway: you risk awkwardness, loss of data or even all associated accounts with uncertain appeal process outcomes, plus potentially legal action.

Even if all your data *is* boring, false positives are highly likely.

-> immich.app/

immich.appHome | ImmichSelf-hosted photo and video management solution

I have to return to an article I published two weeks ago: “Why Even Try? A European Answer to Digital Pessimism“, because it turns out the problem may be deeper than I thought. Do we really believe this little in ourselves? Where does this deep-seated defeatism come from?

I’ve said it before: when I talk about the idea of European digital autonomy, I don’t do so naively. The nature of an idea is that it detaches from current limitations and dares to propose a direction. It might never be fully realized, but it offers guidance. If we start from a place of disbelief, we end up with nihilism.

I was glad to see that the TLDR News EU YouTube channel recently published a video asking whether Europe needs its own social media platforms. But I was disheartened to see that the main argument for it was the EU’s ability to better control content and thus counter foreign influence, like Elon Musk’s political meddling via X (formerly Twitter).

To me, that’s missing the point entirely. We don’t need European alternatives so the EU can control them. We need them so no one can. Platforms aligned with European values should be resilient against both corporate and political dominance. Their virality shouldn’t be driven by profit-maximizing algorithms but by human sharing—one follower at a time. Mastodon and the Fediverse show this is already feasible, even if imperfect.

Yes, such platforms may not thrive under traditional business models—but isn’t that a feature, not a bug? One of our core European values is that not everything should be subject to market forces.

The TLDR video also lists the usual difficulties: network effects, lower quality of European tech, fragmentation. They question whether EU algorithms might also generate echo chambers. But this presumes that European platforms would merely copy American designs—an assumption I strongly reject. Most concerning is the implicit conclusion that building something based on European values would be too complicated to attempt:

  • Europe lacks the digital infrastructure the US has, especially in AI and cybersecurity
  • The EU doesn’t have the same startup culture
  • The EU consists of 27 separate markets and languages

I agree with these facts. But to use them as reasons to give up is terrifying. Have we truly lost the spirit of “not because it is easy, but because it is hard”—the very mindset that once made America great?

It’s hypocritical and unsustainable to celebrate European values while depending entirely on foreign platforms that directly undermine them. That’s like applauding environmentalism while importing goods made with child labor and environmental destruction—as long as it’s far from Europe, we pretend we’re clean.

If we accept that European values can only survive by outsourcing their violation elsewhere, then basically we agree that Elon Musk was right when he said: “The biggest weakness of the West was empathy.”

Yes, the challenge is enormous—but not impossible. Do we really think Europe lacks the minds to build strong AI models? That we can’t scale up our search engines, maps, or data centers? That multilingual platforms can’t be enhanced with translation tools—just like the US platforms already use? This isn’t a lack of cognitive capacity. It’s not even a lack of production capability. We are on par with our global peers in that regard.

What we lack is alignment across all levels—users, entrepreneurs, and policymakers. I know the foundation is shaky. It always was. But if we don’t address this now, in 10–20 years there may be nothing left to preserve.

Regardless of whether you’re conservative or progressive, you’ll find that the European culture and values you care about are no longer there. Despite all our differences, I still believe we Europeans could think together—about what we share, what we want to preserve, and what kind of digital future we want to shape. We must.

📌 Explore my full strategy and share your thoughts: 👉 European Digital Autonomy Initiative

Follow me on Mastodon:
TechTonicShift (@TechTonicShift@vivaldi.net) – Vivaldi Social
Gabor Hrasko (@ghrasko@mastodon.social) – Mastodon

#EDAI #DigitalSovereignty #EuropeanAlternatives #TechTonicShift #EuropeanValues

https://techtonicshift.vivaldi.net/2025/05/18/so-we-europeans-are-hopeless-right/

Microsoft is blocking the ICC prosecutor from accessing his email. Not too surprising. Microsoft and Google both actively support Israel and its systematic apartheid and genocide. US-based corps are not to be trusted. It was just April 30 that Microsoft assured the EU that it could be trusted. The solution for other nations lies in readily available free and open source solutions or those they have built and are hosting themselves.
#Microsoft #DigitalSovereignty #FOSS
apnews.com/article/icc-trump-s