mastodon.ie is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Irish Mastodon - run from Ireland, we welcome all who respect the community rules and members.

Administered by:

Server stats:

1.6K
active users

#thoughtleadership

2 posts2 participants0 posts today

It might have been a bad idea to open LinkedIn on a hot day like today. Even more so than usual. But because reasons1 I did it and oh boy.

Is it just me or did it get even worse in the last couple of months? Just scrolling through the feed feels like the worst kind of parallel universe I can imagine. Just an endless stream of corporate drones, some of them I don’t even know, but are helpfully provided to me by some kind of cruel algorithm, desperately trying to get the attention of “important people” by doing what can only be described as having a little wank in public. And for 99% of them it doesn’t even look like they’re enjoying any of it.

Great, AI has given you a list of 20 𝐰𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐚 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐝𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐬 𝐬𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐜𝐡 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐫𝐚𝐰 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐭𝐬 – posting this will surely let the world know what a great employee you are. Congratulations.
That internal workshop with some “trainer,” who conveniently is the cousin of your head of HR was a real game changer and so inspirational? What did it inspire you to do? Advance your career by posting to LinkedIn?

Good god.

And of course doubt creeps in. I see people who I know are actually good at their jobs and who I thought would not be in a position to have to embarrass themselves by being LinkedIn Posters. And I see absolute dimwits cosplaying as thought leaders and actually having a captive audience.
Do I have to become like them, too? After all, I’m not too far away from being a dimwit and I (clearly) don’t mind embarrassing myself online, either.

But first I might need to understand why people do this. Write and read all that inane drivel on a website that’s basically peter-principle-as-a-service. Do people actually enjoy going there? And if so, what about it is the fun part? Or are they just trapped by the illusion that this is just what they have to do to stay afloat in corporate capitalism?
Or at least I hope it’s an illusion. If not, it would be even bleaker. Ugh. Just imagine they’re right about this?

Maybe I should just do what a (former, as of this month) coworker did and just disable my account. It’s clearly not for me and every time I look at that website, I get this weird twitch underneath my eye.
Or maybe I’m just grumpy because I ran out of ice cream.

  1. No, not those reasons. I’m not actively looking. But hey, my DMs are open. ↩︎

Hey Mastadon Friends!

If you enjoy real talk about AI, creative independence, prompt engineering, and future-proof thinking, with zero fluff and a little flavor, then you’ll probably dig PromptCraft: my Free Substack.

I write about:
Sovereign AI and what it means for creators, businesses, and governments.
Voice interfaces and how they’re reshaping human-computer interaction
And occasionally, how to stay human in the middle of all this chaos.
I’m not trying to build a cult. Just a smarter audience (that's also kind of a cult).

👉 Subscribe here for FREE access to articles, visuals, and thought experiments you won’t find on LinkedIn: lnkd.in/gVj7givm
If you’re in AI, strategy, creative tech, or just curious about what’s next, consider this your signal.

lnkd.inLinkedInThis link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn

Pre-orders are officially LIVE!

I'm incredibly excited to announce that my new book, "𝐷𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑅𝑎𝑖𝑛: 𝐻𝑜𝑤 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑑 𝐿𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑠 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑤 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑦 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠," is now available for pre-order, with delivery expected in July 2025!

For over 30 years, I've had the privilege of guiding organizations through disruption and change, witnessing firsthand that "the future does not wait for the cautious. It belongs to the bold". This book distills decades of insight into a practical blueprint for leaders navigating today's complex world.

"Dancing in the Rain" challenges the conventional wisdom that "the best thing to do is to hunker down and wait it out" during uncertainty. Instead, it champions the idea that "the smartest strategy is to 'just say no' to the narrative" of pessimism, and that "mindset is the first move" to seizing opportunity.

This book is EXACTLY what you need right now!

You'll learn why "the future accelerates toward those who refuse to stand still", and how to cultivate the resilience to "dance in the rain" by embracing action, driving innovation, and transforming challenges into growth opportunities. This book is your roadmap to not just survive, but to truly thrive, when the skies grow dark.

Pre-order your copy today and get ready to lead stronger in stormy times!

**#DancingInTheRain** **#Leadership** **#Innovation** **#PreOrder** **#BusinessBooks** **#JimCarroll** **#FutureTrends** **#Resilience** **#ThoughtLeadership**

Replied in thread

@elementary tl;dr I support your objectives, and kudos on the goal, but I think you should monitor this new policy for unexpected negative outcomes. I take about 9k characters to explain why, but I’m not criticizing your intent.

While I am much more pragmatic about my stance on #aicoding this was previously a long-running issue of contention on the #StackExchange network that was never really effectively resolved outside of a few clearly egregious cases.

The triple-net is that when it comes to certain parts of software—think of the SCO copyright trials over header files from a few decades back—in many cases, obvious code will be, well…obvious. That “the simplest thing that could possibly work” was produced by an AI instead of a person is difficult to prove using existing tools, and false accusations of plagiarism have been a huge problem that has caused a number of people real #reputationalharm over the last couple of years.

That said, I don’t disagree with the stance that #vibecoding is not worth the pixels that it takes up on a screen. From a more pragmatic standpoint, though, it may be more useful to address the underlying principle that #plagiarism is unacceptable from a community standards or copyright perspective rather than making it a tool-specific policy issue.

I’m a firm believer that people have the right to run their community projects in whatever way best serves their community members. I’m only pointing out the pragmatic issues of setting forth a policy where the likelihood of false positives is quite high, and the level of pragmatic enforceability may be quite low. That is something that could lead to reputational harm to people and the project, or to community in-fighting down the road, when the real policy you’re promoting (as I understand it) is just a fundamental expectation of “original human contributions” to the project.

Because I work in #riskmanagement and #cybersecurity I see this a lot. This is an issue that comes up more often than you might think. Again, I fully support your objectives, but just wanted to offer an alternative viewpoint that your project might want to revisit down the road if the current policy doesn’t achieve the results that you’re hoping for.

In the meantime, I certainly wish you every possible success! You’re taking a #thoughtleadership stance on an important #AIgovernance policy issue that is important to society and to #FOSS right now. I think that’s terrific!

Webinars Are Old News.
Here Is Something New: ITSPmagazine's #Webinars

The Future Of #ThoughtLeadership Is Here
More Than Just a Presentation—They Are Conversations That Matter.

In this short intro episode - youtu.be/exSA-IyW1DY - Sean Martin and I share why we’re redefining the webinar experience. No boring decks. No sales pitches disguised as panels. Just real, honest, expert-led conversations that dive deep into the #technology, the #cybersecurity, and #societal topics shaping our world.

From #AI in #healthcare and secure #coding, to #smartcities, #space, #robots, #quantum computing—and yes, maybe even #pizza 🍕🤣 —these sessions bring together industry #leaders, innovators, and curious minds like you.

Join live to ask questions, share thoughts, and be part of the moment.
Or catch the replay on demand. Either way, the learning—and the thinking—never stop.

🔗 Explore upcoming and past sessions: itspmagazine.com/webinars

📺 Subscribe to the channel and follow the conversation.
crowdcast.io/ @ITSPmagazine

Join the upcoming one:
AI In Healthcare: Who Benefits, Who Pays, And Who’s At Risk? — An ITSPmagazine Thought Leadership Webinar | Mar 25, 2025
crowdcast.io/c/ai-in-healthcar

Webinars aren’t dead.
They just needed a reboot.
This is it! 🤘😬

Webinars Are Old News.
Here Is Something New: #Webinars!

ITSPmagazine Webinars — The Future Of Thought Leadership Is Here
More Than Just a Presentation—They Are Conversations That Matter.

In this short intro episode, Sean Martin and I share why we’re redefining the webinar experience. No boring decks. No sales pitches disguised as panels. Just real, honest, expert-led conversations that dive deep into the technology, the cybersecurity, and societal topics shaping our world.

youtu.be/oRczlpD9bLs

From #AI in healthcare and secure coding, to #smartcities, #space, #robots, #quantum computing—and yes, maybe even #pizza 🍕🤣 —these sessions bring together industry #leaders, innovators, and curious minds like you.

Join live to ask questions, share thoughts, and be part of the moment.
Or catch the replay on demand. Either way, the learning—and the #thinking—never stop.

🔗 Explore upcoming and past sessions: itspmagazine.com/webinars

📺 Subscribe to the channel and follow the conversation.
crowdcast.io/@itspmagazine

Join the upcoming one
AI In #Healthcare: Who Benefits, Who Pays, And Who’s At Risk? — An ITSPmagazine Thought #Leadership Webinar | Mar 25, 2025
crowdcast.io/c/ai-in-healthcar

Webinars aren’t dead.
They just needed a reboot.
This is it! 🤘 😬

#cybersecurity, #technology, #webinars, #thoughtleadership, #AI, #innovation, #infosec, #society

Understanding the key elements that make B2B thought leadership effective is crucial for companies looking to establish credibility and influence in their industry. By providing valuable insights, thought leaders can build trust with their audience and position themselves as experts in their field. Consistency, relevance, and authenticity are some of the factors that contribute to successful thought leadership. #B2B #ThoughtLeadership #IndustryInfluence
toprankmarketing.com/blog/what

I have an interest in (and frequently use) semiotics, as anyone who spends any time with me knows. It's the study of signs: linguistic, visual etc.

It helps when I design training, talks, workshops, and materials I make for people. Studying it during my MA gave me an even deeper appreciation of the power signs have.

I am so tired of seeing the Infosec world blame victims, call people 'offenders' and 'repeat offenders' when they do something, and more derogatory language when discussing end users. These are all words we use for crimes, criminals, actively malicious people. These are not words we should be using for our staff and end users.

It's glorified victim blaming rooted in a deep ego fueled feeling of superiority (conscious or not) of those working in Infosec. We don't go out and call students repeat offenders if they score poorly in a test. We accept our training has failed and we find another way to teach them so they can succeed.

Training in Infosec is generally abominable, aggressive, and based on proven terrible ways to train. In addition, Infosec teams and vendors, and even those bodies we look to for gold standards use victim blaming, criminal associated language for those we are here to help - our end users.

We need to take a good hard look at ourselves as an industry. We need to look at how we speak and treat people. It is not OK. It has never been OK. It never will be OK. We need to stop with the 'we've always done it like this' and acknowledge the harm we are doing to our end users by blaming them for our failures; in language, in training, in how we talk about and view them. It has to stop. If only because it doesn't just harm the end users, but how it harms the security staff and undermines their empathy for the end users.

End users, our staff who we are here to protect, are not 'repeat offenders', they aren't stupid. We fail them every time we use that language or treat them like that. We fail them every time we don't see our training isn't working and blame them instead of our training. We fail them every single time we just 'do something because we've always done it' instead of thinking critically and actually create proper training.