mastodon.ie is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Irish Mastodon - run from Ireland, we welcome all who respect the community rules and members.

Administered by:

Server stats:

1.8K
active users

#philosophyofscience

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Replied in thread

@sarahdalgulls I know that generative AI applies a set of rules , and is just a "text rearranger". However, I don't see that as necessary precluding intelligent results, as there are many examples of emergent complexity in mathematics. One example the Mandelbrot set has infinite complexity, yet arises from applying a simple rule to each point. A classic example is the [game of life en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway], where different starting states can give different complex outcomes.

So, I would not be surprised if a complex system produced more than you'd expect by just rearranging words. When and if we do create real artificial intelligence it won't be something planned and programmed but an emergence from a complex system, just as our intelligence is an emergence from neurons that fire depending on complex rules. It is likely to be quite different from anything we predicted the system would do, and possibly not obvious as intelligence at first.

If you are aware of curious and critical students looking for a unique interdisciplinary #MSc Programme which combines #PhilosophyOfTechnology, #PhilosophyOfScience, #EthicsOfTechnology, #HistoryOfTechnology and #STS , please point them to #Philosophy of #Science , #Technology , and #Society. At the Open Day, they learn about our dedicated tracks on #TechnologyAndValues (in collaboration with 4TU.Centre for Ethics and Technology), #AI , and #Sustainability. utwente.nl/en/education/study-

Workshop: Large Language Models for the History, Philosophy & Sociology of Science
April 2–4, 2025
TU Berlin, Germany & Online
Exploring how LLMs can address challenges in HPSS research
Keynotes by Iryna Gurevych, Nina Tahmasebi & Pierluigi Cassotti
16 contributed talks on LLM use cases & implications

Free and open to the public—registration encouraged! More info: tu.berlin/hps-mod-sci/workshop](tu.berlin/hps-mod-sci/workshop
#AI #HistoryOfScience #PhilosophyOfScience #SociologyOfScience #LLMs

www.tu.berlinWorkshop "LLMs for HPSS" - TU Berlin
Replied in thread

@fringemagnet @jifi @benroyce

Even if you were familiar with Karl Popper, that could still be a good advice to read it again

Look at what #US #Americans do when they say/pretend they are familiar with Jesus Christ: they do all the contrary of what he is meant to have preached #whitenationalism #ultraright #farright (In deed they never read anything, except when they are already agreeing on the idea, so as they can be sure not to read something else)

So I don't think that being "familiar" with anything is the way to go: Maybe "being able to discuss" is a much stronger stance?

Personally, I am not able to "discuss" Karl Popper. I simply study #epistemology and #philosophyofscience at my rhythm.

I SEEK ONE ... strong beta reader for a #philosophy / #philosophyOfScience essay that makes a new argument for and about ontic #vagueness.

Two goals: (1) provide feedback/recommendations; (2) help introduce a new idea by validating that it's interesting and may be worth a read.

Although I completed degrees in philosophy and physics (once upon a time) I have lived a career of activism and union organizing, so this one is outside the expertise of my professional community. I would deeply appreciate it if a philosophically-minded physicist or a physically-minded philosopher would be willing to help out.